Stephen Six v. Generations Federal Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNCAN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of the district court's order sanctioning three attorneys and their law firms under both its inherent authority and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 . Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.
I
The district court based its decision to award sanctions on a comprehensive evaluation of the attorneys' conduct. That conduct was, in many respects, egregious, and it continued throughout the various stages of litigation and appeal. As will be explained in detail below, the sanctioned attorneys challenged the authenticity of a loan agreement for two years before revealing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by223 opinions
- Svetlana Lokhova v. Stefan HalperCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Derek Harvey v. CNNCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Balt. Scrap Corp. v. Exec. Risk Specialty Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Robert Wharton v. Superintendent Graterford SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.