Legal Opinion

Cricenti v. Bewley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 12, 1980No. 79-184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether the evidence supported the master’s finding that a right to use water from a spring had been lost by abandonment. We hold that it did.

Plaintiffs are the owners of land located on the westerly side of Route 11 in New London. The deed conveying the property to plaintiff’s father, Joseph Cricenti, in 1948 recited a water right from a spring located on land now owned by defendants located on the opposite side of the highway conveyed by “Fred B. Gay . . . July 20, 1920 and recorded with the deed.” The 1920 deed was not recorded, however, and has been lost.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Ballou v. BallouSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Heston v. OuslerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Sargent Lake Ass'n v. DaneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Marcou Construction Co. v. Tinkham Industrial & Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellison v. FellowsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Downing House Realty v. HampeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Boissy v. ChevionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API