Legal Opinion
Burlodge Ltd. v. Standex International Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 28, 2009No. Misc. Action No. 08-525 (CKK/JMF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United states Magistrate Judge.
Currently before the court is a Motion to Compel Compliance with a subpoena, pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed by Burlodge Limited. Motion of Burlodge Limited for an Order Compelling the Department of Veterans Affairs to Comply %vith Subpoena [# 1] (“Mot. to Comp.”).
BACKGROUND
This Motion to Compel arises out of a patent infringement case, currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, regarding a method of preparing and serving food using “rethermal-ization”…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Subpoena to GoldbergDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Saperstein v. the Palestinian AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Canal Insurance Company v. BacaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Danzy v. Iatse Local 22District Court, District of Columbia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.