Legal Opinion

Holloway v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2011No. 08-CF-1454PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

The jury in this criminal prosecution found appellant Katrina Holloway guilty of arson, rejecting her claim that she set the fire by accident and not on purpose. The sole issue before us on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it instructed the jury on appellant’s theory of defense. Appellant contends the court violated her right to due process by refusing to make clear to the jury that the government bore the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the fire was not accidental.

We disagree with that claim. Although the court declined to deliver the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Michael Joe Taylor, United States of America v. Chardale Arnaz Bowe, United States of America v. Eric Lamont HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Stack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howard University v. Roberts-WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. United States v. Everett PurvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  3. Atkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Blocker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Neal v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API