Meyerowitz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
A claimant appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission (“UAC”) affirming an appeals referee’s decision finding the claimant ineligible for benefits following her discharge from employment. The UAC determined that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with work, prohibiting her from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. While the UAC expressly found that she had committed an act of dishonesty, the referee found only that she had violated a policy of her employer. Because the single violation of policy could not constitute misconduct, we reverse.
The decision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hines v. Dept. of Labor & Emp. SEC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- San Roman v. Unemployment Appeals Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Vilar v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Borland v. Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Lucido v. State, Unemployment Appeals Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arbor Tree Management, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011