Legal Opinion

State v. Clarke

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 2, 1941No. 6 Div. 717PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice..The question in this case is whether a penalty prescribed by law to be added to an assessment of escaped taxes is properly added under the circumstances of this case. It is not a question of whether such a penalty may be waived by the court.

If it is not proper in accordance' with law as duly interpreted, to impose the penalty, a denial of it does not infringe upon section 100 of the Constitution. For in that event, it is not a debt due the State and never was. The sole inquiry is whether it is such a debt. If so, it was proper to impose it, and, if not a debt, it was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Gunter v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. State v. PageWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State Tax Commission v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Gachet v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Finerson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. City of Mobile v. Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Downing v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. State v. MackCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API