State v. Clarke
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice..The question in this case is whether a penalty prescribed by law to be added to an assessment of escaped taxes is properly added under the circumstances of this case. It is not a question of whether such a penalty may be waived by the court.
If it is not proper in accordance' with law as duly interpreted, to impose the penalty, a denial of it does not infringe upon section 100 of the Constitution. For in that event, it is not a debt due the State and never was. The sole inquiry is whether it is such a debt. If so, it was proper to impose it, and, if not a debt, it was not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Gunter v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- State v. PageWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- State Tax Commission v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Gachet v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Finerson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- City of Mobile v. Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Downing v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- State v. MackCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982