Legal Opinion

Gregg v. Garrett

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from, Eighth, Judicial District, Cascade County. Action of claim and delivery. Defendant had judgment below. Motion for new trial denied by Benton, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarwood, J.

This is an action of claim and delivery of personal property. Through the process therein, plaintiff recovered possession of a certain quantity of hay. Each party claimed to be the owner thereof. The trial resulted in a verdict by the jury in favor of defendant for the return of the hay to him, or the payment of one hundred dollars, the value thereof, to defendant by plaintiff, and judgment was entered accordingly.

Plaintiff prepared and served a notice of intention to move for new trial, wholly omitting to state therein, as required by statute, whether the motion would “ be made upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christy v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Flateau v. LubeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co. v. BolesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacGregor v. PierceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Louder v. HunterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. WhaleyMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Traxinger v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Saval v. BlumeNevada Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API