Legal Opinion
Gustave Fischer Co. v. Morrison
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 9, 1951PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The plaintiff sued on the common counts, supplemented by a bill of particulars, to recover a balance of $672.95 due for photographic supplies shipped to the defendant. The answer of the defendant consists of a general denial and a special defense which alleges that the plaintiff shipped him supplies in excess of the limitation and without the signed order specifically prescribed in a letter which had been sent by him to it. The court sustained the special defense and rendered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed.
The principal facts material to our decision which are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hertzog v. HertzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
- Modern Woodmen v. TevisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Janusauskas v. FichmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Freda v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Bershtein, Bershtein & Bershtein, P.C. v. NemethSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.