Legal Opinion

Borgerson v. Cook Stone Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 1903No. Nos. 13,599 — (128)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, Brooks, J., entered upon a verdict of $775 in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

LOVELY, J.2

Action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, while at work in a stone quarry, through the alleged negligence of defendant’s foreman. He recovered a verdict. A new trial was not sought, but there was a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was denied. Judgment was entered for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

As a necessary result, under concessions of counsel on both sides, the' only question we are to determine is whether there was evidence rea-' sonably tending to support the recovery. Questions arising upon the pleadings and all orders and rulings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindvall v. WoodsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Perras v. A. Booth & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Peterson v. American Grass Twine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Gittens v. William Porten Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Vogt v. HonstainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jemming v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Hendrickson v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Barrett v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Hjelm v. Western Granite Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API