Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Culton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 31, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

These two actions of tort arise out of the same accident, which occurred on April 30, 1927, on the State highway in the town of Walpole. The plaintiffs are husband and wife. The husband was the owner of the automobile which was in collision with the defendant’s truck. There was evidence of the defendant’s negligence.

*475On the night in question the plaintiff Clarence Hanson, accompanied by Mrs. Hanson, “had driven his automobile to Boston to attend a banquet. . . . He never had the automobile, involved in the accident, with him in Boston until the night of the accident.” The record recites that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Hanley v. Eastern Steamship Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Gondek v. Cudahy Packing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Collector of Taxes v. New England Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Jenkins v. North Shore Dye House, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Klefbeck v. DousMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. vanDresser v. FirlingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API