Legal Opinion
DeFAZIO v. HOLLISTER, INC.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 2, 2009No. CIV. 04-1358 WBS GGH, 05-0559 WBS GGH, 05-1726 WBS GGHPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
On June 29, 2009, 636 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E.D.Cal.2009), the court issued an Order in the above-titled action (“June 29 Order”) granting in part and denying in part the parties’ various cross motions for summary judgment. Thereafter, on August 24, 2009, plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration requesting that the court review and set aside several findings of the June 29 Order. 1 Although “[mjotions for reconsideration are disfavored,” Tucker v. Garcia, No. 03-5594, 2009 WL 2448595, at *1 (E.D.Cal. Aug. 10,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Johnson v. CouturierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Harris v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Dixon v. Wallowa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.