Legal Opinion

Milk Control Commission v. Rieck Dairy Division

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1960No. Appeal, No. 53PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This appeal is from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County reversing an order of the Milk Control Commission which suspended the appellee’s milk dealer’s license for violation of section 807 of the Milk Control Law of April 28, 1937, P. L. 417, as amended, 31 P.S. §700j-807.

This section provides, inter alia: “After the commission shall have fixed prices to be charged or paid for milk, ... it shall be unlawful for a milk dealer . . . knotoingly or unknowingly, or any other person knowingly, by himself or through another, to sell or deliver, or make…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Rohrer v. Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Cooperative Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Finucane v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Cooperative AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. Hoffman v. Garden State Farms, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API