Legal Opinion

Crumpton v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1985No. SC S31516PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

A prospective petition for a state measure to be initiated has been filed with the respondent pursuant to ORS 250.045. Acting under ORS 250.065(2), the respondent has sent copies of the measure to the Attorney General, who has provided to the respondent a ballot title for the measure pursuant to ORS 250.065(3). The provided title follows:

“AMENDS CONSTITUTION: REDUCES PROPERTY TAX RATE OVER THREE YEAR PERIOD
“QUESTION: Shall Constitution cut real property tax rates, limit assessed value increases and tax elections, and require elections for new taxes?
“EXPLANATION: Constitutional amendment cuts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ferry v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Binninger v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Young v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stanwood v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API