Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1904No. 20,191PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Marion Criminal Court (33,518); Fremont Alford, Judge. Joseph Spaulding was convicted of murder in tlie first degree, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

Upon a trial on an indictment for murder in the first degree, the defendant Spaulding was found guilty, and his punishment .was assessed at imprisonment for life. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment was rendered upon the verdict.

The defendant appeals, and assigns for error the ruling on the motion for a new trial. The reasons stated in the motion, and not waived by failure to discuss them, were: (1) That since the trial the defendant has discovered new evidence, material to him, which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial; (2) that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hamm v. RomineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Sutherlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Morel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hire v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greenway v. Taylor CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Paulausky v. Polish Roman Catholic UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kuslulis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API