Legal Opinion
Prince v. Poole
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 27, 2006No. 1030755Published
1Opinion of the Court
935 So.2d 431 (2006)
Robert F. PRINCE; The Prince Law Firm, P.C., as successor to Prince, Poole, Cross & Fischer, P.C.; Charles E. Pearson, P.C.; and Charles E. Pearson
v.
Phil POOLE.
1030755.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
January 27, 2006.
Michael L. Edwards and Scott B. Grover of Balch & Bingham, LLP, Birmingham; and John A. Owens and Anna N. Hutcheson of Owens & Millsaps, LLP, Tuscaloosa, for appellants Robert F. Prince and The Prince Law Firm, P.C., as successor to Prince, Poole, Cross & Fischer, P.C.
W. Stancil Starnes, Laura Howard Peck, and Robin H. Jones of Starnes & Atchison, LLP, Birmingham;…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- John Balderston and John Gabriel v. Fairbanks Morse Engine Division of Coltec Industries, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.