Legal Opinion
Pepitone v. Pepitone
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur W. Lonschein, J.
The question presented is whether the plaintiff is entitled to sequestration of her former husband's pension benefits at the present time, approximately five years in advance of the earliest date at which they can become payable.
FACTS
The facts are not in dispute, and were submitted to the court by stipulation. The defendant husband was born on October 9,1940, and was a first baseman for the New York Yankees during the 1960’s. He is a qualified member of the Major League Baseball Players Benefit Plan (the Plan). He will be eligible to elect “early…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Bank of North America v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 3Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Cody v. RieckerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Cogollos v. CogollosNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Alexandre v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Aurora G. v. Harold Aaron G.New York City Family Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Price v. PalagoniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Stackhouse v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Sochor v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Lyddy v. LyddyOhio Court of Appeals · 1990