Legal Opinion

Holman v. PAPIO-MISSOURI RIVER NAT. RES.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1994No. S-93-407Published

1Opinion of the Court

523 N.W.2d 510 (1994)

246 Neb. 787

Max HOLMAN and Rose M. Holman, Appellees,

v.

PAPIO-MISSOURI RIVER NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT, Appellant.

No. S-93-407.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

November 4, 1994.

Paul F. Peters, of Schmid, Mooney & Frederick, Omaha, for appellant.

Dixon G. Adams, Papillion, for appellees.

HASTINGS, C.J., WHITE, CAPORALE, FAHRNBRUCH, LANPHIER, and WRIGHT, JJ., and BOSLAUGH, J., Retired.

CAPORALE, Justice.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

After our determination in Holman v. Papio Nat. Resources Dist, 228 Neb. 94, 421 N.W.2d 430 (1988) (Holman I), that the Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lindsay Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Clearwater Corp. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McVaney v. BAIRD, HOLM, McEACHENNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API