Legal Opinion

Kazmir v. Suburban Homes Realty

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1992No. 6-91-037-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves two summary judgments. Kazmir, et al (hereinafter Kazmir) and Suburban Homes Realty (hereinafter Suburban) each contend that the summary judgment in favor of the other was improper because genuine issues of fact exist. We agree and reverse both judgments.

Suburban purchased lots in the Woodland Trails North Subdivision near Houston and constructed homes for sale. The subdivision is located over an active geological fault. The plaintiffs are more than fifty homeowners who purchased homes that are located on or near the fault. They purchased…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cannon v. ICO Tubular Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Souder v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Nicholson v. Herman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Southwest Properties, L.P. v. Lite-Dec of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API