Legal Opinion

Buelna v. Ryan

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1903No. S.F. No. 2883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to recover damages for breach of contract to marry. The case was tried with a jury, and a verdict rendered for plaintiff in the sum of seven liundred and fifty dollars, upon which judgment was entered. This appeal is from the judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

1. It is claimed that the court erred in overruling the •defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. The complaint was filed August 11, 1900. The contract to marry is alleged to have been made on August 10,1898, and the breach or refusal •of defendant to marry the plaintiff is…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Sweinhart v. BambergerNew York Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API