Legal Opinion

Hodgkins v. American Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1936No. Civ. 10086PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

On the denial of a petition for ratable partial distribution, the probate court determined the persons to whom, and the manner in which, distribution should be 4iade. The appellants are the granddaughter and the brother, respectively, of the testatrix. They state three questions are involved in the appeal, but concede that if the question o|£ the abatement of the legacies is determined favorably to them, the other points may be deemed waived. We coniine our examination to this question as the order must be reverse)! on that ground.

The question involves an interpretation of sections 750, 751…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of AppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Buck v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Estate of LuckelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Estate of JenanyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API