Legal Opinion

Buck v. Peterson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1948No. Sac. 5790PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The executor of the will of Frank H. Buck, being in doubt as to whether there had been a partial ademption of certain legacies, petitioned for instructions under section 588 of the Probate Code. The will bequeathed 30,000 shares of the Belridge Oil Company stock to the testator’s six children, 5,000 shares of the same stock and $30,000 in cash to Helen S. Peterson,, certain cash and property to others, and the residue to his wife. When the will was executed Mr. Buck owned 40,000 shares of the stock, but he later transferred 10,000 of them to his wife and had only 30,000 shares When he died.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. First Parish in FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. Estate of AppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. In Re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. In re the Construction of the Last Will & Testament of StrasenburghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Estate of MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of HelfmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Layous v. Monterey County Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Estate of LuckelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Estate of BlackmunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API