Wiard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge.
{1} This case addresses coverage for a separate loss of consortium claim under the claimant’s uninsured/underinsured automobile policies, pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 66-5-301(B) (1983). Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals from a summary judgment order in favor of Plaintiff Ted Wiard (Wiard) on Wiard’s complaint for declaratory relief. The trial court determined State Farm was liable for uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage for Wiard’s loss of consortium claims based upon the deaths of his two daughters in an automobile…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Mitchell-Carr v. McLendonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Fernandez v. Walgreen Hastings Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Gonzales v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Luebbers ex rel. SalazarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. WillieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Sanderson v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- King v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. WillieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.