Legal Opinion

Wiard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 2002No. 21,819PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge.

{1} This case addresses coverage for a separate loss of consortium claim under the claimant’s uninsured/underinsured automobile policies, pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 66-5-301(B) (1983). Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals from a summary judgment order in favor of Plaintiff Ted Wiard (Wiard) on Wiard’s complaint for declaratory relief. The trial court determined State Farm was liable for uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage for Wiard’s loss of consortium claims based upon the deaths of his two daughters in an automobile…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Mitchell-Carr v. McLendonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fernandez v. Walgreen Hastings Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gonzales v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Luebbers ex rel. SalazarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. WillieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Sanderson v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. King v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. WillieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API