Legal Opinion

Snapp v. Manning

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1925No. 11,198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Plaintiffs in error, Snapp and wife, were defendants below; Manning, defendant in error, was plaintiff. They are here designated as in the trial court.

Action was brought by Manning against defendants to recover compensation for the preparation by him for them of sketches, plans, specifications and estimates for the erection of a contemplated apartment house. Plaintiff’s performance of contract and defendants’ breach thereof were alleged. Plaintiff’s first cause of action was on express contract; the second on quantum meruit. Defendants answered denying plaintiff’s allegations and set forth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Larson v. LongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Grimes v. HillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Chase v. LathropSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Scott Supply & Tool Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. LeDoux v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Epstein v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Clark v. GiacominiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Alexander v. WhiteColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API