Legal Opinion
Etkin v. Marcus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 25, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 5, 1979, which denied her motion for leave to serve an amended complaint setting forth a cause of action for lack of informed consent against defendant Marcus only. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The motion was properly denied because the proposed amendment is patently insufficient to set forth a cause of action for lack of informed consent. (See Molino v County of Putnam, 30 AD2d 929.) This is not a case where the wrong complained of, with respect to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zeleznik v. Jewish Chronic Disease HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Murriello v. CrapottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Eley v. Brooklyn Cumberland Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Molino v. County of PutnamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reed v. CampagnoloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Keselman v. Kingsboro Medical GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Schel v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Kossover v. TrattlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Saguid v. Kingston HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.