Legal Opinion

Gedney v. Planten

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided August 15, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendant before trial.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This is a motion made by the defendant to vacate an order heretofore obtained for the examination of the defendant before trial. The action is *494brought to recover damages for libel. It appears from the fácts alleged in the complaint that the defendant had been engaged in business under the firm name and style of H. Planten & Son; that plaintiff’s father was one James R. Gedney, and that in the year 1835 he began business as a manufacturer of proprietary medicines, among other things a compound of copaiba and oil of cubebs colored black; that said James R. Gedney continued the said business…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cummings v. HenningerArizona Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API