Legal Opinion

United States v. Nolasco-Rosas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 20, 2002No. 01-50022PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-Appellant Nolasco-Rosas (“Nolasco”) was indicted for transporting undocumented aliens within the United States for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (B)(i). He was tried by a jury and convicted of aiding and abetting, and was sentenced to thirty-three months of imprisonment. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. Finding no reversible error in Nolasco’s conviction or his sentencing, we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Border Patrol Officer Jeff Sagemuehl was driving to work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine KhamisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Georgina Barbara DiazCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. De Jesus-BatresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Eugene Flores v. Select Energy Services, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. David AndertonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API