Legal Opinion
Mohammed v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 18, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Jose Martinez appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated December 16, 1996, which denied his motion for leave to amend his answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of Jose Martinez to amend his answer to change an admission to a denial of the allegation that he had given the defendant Orlando Santana permission…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Beuschel v. MalmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Pellegrino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- M. Kramer & Sons, Inc. v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ravnikar v. Skyline Credit-Ride, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Boyd v. TrentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Frank v. NowickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Velez v. South Nine Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Wagner v. VarianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998