Legal Opinion

Velez v. South Nine Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*891The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant South Nine Realty Corp. (hereinafter South Nine). The infant plaintiffs allegedly sustained injuries from exposure to lead paint while residing in an apartment building owned by South Nine. To establish their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on the issue of liability, the plaintiffs were required to establish, as a matter of law, the existence of a lead hazard at the subject premises, that South Nine had actual or constructive notice of the condition, that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Chapman v. SilberNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Clarkin v. Staten Island University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. M. Kramer & Sons, Inc. v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tesser v. Allboro Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API