United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Warren Painting Co., Inc. v. J. C. Boespflug Construction Co. And Travelers Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit, brought under the Miller Act, § 2, 49 Stat. 794 (1935), 40 U.S.C. § 270b (1958), to recover compensation for work performed in the construction of a government facility near Anchorage, Alaska. The action was brought on behalf of Warren Painting Company, Inc. (Warren), painting subcontractor on the project. The general contractor, J. C. Boespflug Construction Co. (Boespflug), and the surety on the general contractor’s payment bond, Travelers Indemnity Co., were named defendants.
Three claims were stated in the complaint, one of which involved asserted…
2Cited by6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. E & R Construction Co. v. Guy H. James Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972
- United States Ex Rel. Chemetron Corp. v. George A. Fuller Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1966
- Seaboard Surety Co., a Corporate Entity, Etc. v. United States of America for Use and Benefit of C.D.G., Inc., a Corporate EntityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Ralston Purina Co. v. RyderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Empire Enterprises JKB, Inc. v. Union City Contractors, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.