Legal Opinion

Woodall v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1920No. 22,723PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This lawsuit arose over the custody of a child. Charles A. Woodall and the intervener were married and divorced in Oklahoma. In the action for the divorce the intervener was given the exclusive custody of the child in question, but the husband and father was given the right to see the child at all reasonable times. Later the original decree was modified by the trial court of Oklahoma, and the father was given the right to visit the child at reasonable intervals—

“Such-visits to be made in the presence of the said plaintiff, Eva May Woodall,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re BortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Petitt v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Pinney v. SulzenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. In re HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. In re KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kruse v. KruseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Travis v. TravisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Janney v. JanneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Gaunt v. GauntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API