Legal Opinion

Pinney v. Sulzen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1914No. 18,890; No. 19,000PublishedCited by 25 opinions

No. 18,890. Original proceeding in habeas corpus. No. 19,000. Appeal from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge. Opinion filed January 10, 1914.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In proceedings in habeas corpus Perry E. Pinney seeks to obtain the custody of his daughter, Helen, who is about seven years of age. He *409and the mother of Helen were married in Omaha, Neb., in April, 1900. Two children were born to them, Harvey on March 23, 1902, and Helen on September 24, 1906. There was discord in the family relations and a separation occurred shortly after the birth of Helen. In 1908 the petitioner began an action in a court in Iowa to obtain a divorce from his wife, and in November of that year a judgment of divorce…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. In re BortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Clarke v. LyonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Petitt v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. In re NeffWashington Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chandler v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Vallimont v. MedfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. In the Interest of BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. In Re ArmentroutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Kailer v. KailerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API