Legal Opinion
Paul CUMMINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARKER SEAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1975No. 74-1607PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
Appellant Paul Cummins brought this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging that .he had been illegally discharged on the basis of his religion. In essence the complaint charged that Appellant’s employer, Parker Seal Company, did not perform its duty under the Act to accommodate Appellant’s religious practices and observances. The District Court entered judgment in favor of the Company, and this appeal followed. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
On December 9, 1958, Appellant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rodges REDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GAF CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- John H. DRAPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Maine Human Rights Commission v. Local 1361, United Paperworkers International Union AFL-CIOSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.