Jackson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Parker. Tried below before Hon. J. W. Patterson. This conviction was for burglary, and the penalty assessed was a term of two years in the penitentiary. The opinion of the court states the proof involved in the rulings.
1Opinion of the Court
Willson, Judge.
We are not called upon to determine the admissibility of the testimony objected to by defendant, as the bills .of exception fail to show that said testimony was admitted. The said bills merely recite that it was offered by the State, objected to by the defendant, and that defendant’s objections thereto were overruled. It should have been distinctly stated in the bills that the testimony was admitted and went before the jury. Burke v. The State, 25 Texas Ct. App., 172; Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 2368.
It was proved that one of the sacks stolen at the time of the burglary was…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Grantello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Willsman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Morelock v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.