Legal Opinion

Ganahl v. Ganahl

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 6, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for partition of real estate. The construction of the will of Fidel Ganahl is involved, and plaintiff's right to partition depends upon a construction favorable to him. A demurrer, averring that the amended petition failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, was filed. The trial court sustained it. Thereupon plaintiff refused to plead further, the trial court entered judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiff appealed.

It is necessary to set forth the petition. Omitting caption and signatures it reads:

"Plaintiff, for cause of action, states that he…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harrington v. PierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. De Lashmutt v. TeetorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Duffield v. PikeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  4. McHugh v. McColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Stake v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Odom v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Cope v. Western Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. King v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Powers v. Grand Lodge of Ancient, Free & Accepted MasonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API