Commonwealth v. Hlavsa
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge:
The Commonwealth appeals from the ruling of the Suppression Court that the results of a blood test performed on Mr. Hlavsa, the Appellee, be suppressed.
The issue presented on appeal is whether Mr. Hlavsa was under arrest at the time the blood test was performed, which would have made the blood test a lawful search incident to arrest under the doctrine of Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969).
The blood was taken from Mr. Hlavsa at the direction of a State Police Officer while Mr. Hlavsa was unconscious in the emergency room of a hospital.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. FunkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. GoosbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CieriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ashford v. SkilesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. MontgomerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. HlavsaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979