Legal Opinion
Ashford v. Skiles
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 12, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-6385PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me are two motions for summary judgment on plaintiffs pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his civil rights. They were filed by (1) St. Josephs Hospital and Nurse Ann Newcomer (“Hospital defendants”); and, (2) Steven Skiles, James Neimer, Andrew Morgan, Jeff Kraus, Ken Swit-zer, and Ralph Anderson (“Lancaster County defendants”).
In these motions I am called upon to decide: (A) if the issue of excessive force was decided at a state court suppression hearing prior to plaintiffs trial for driving under the influence such…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Moore v. TartlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- DiNicola v. DiPaoloDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Pirito v. Penn Engineering World HoldingsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re Fidelity Bank Trust Fee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.