Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Freeman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 25, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

It is a familiar principle that judicial decisions are primarily designed to furnish future rules of conduct for the general public. Since, therefore, the individuals who may base their future actions upon determinations by the courts are many, Whereas the parties to any particular action are necessarily limited in number, it is obviously of greater importance that sound fundamental principles should be followed rather than that the convenience or interest of particular litigants be served.

The question raised in the case at bar concerns the proper classification and consequent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SmallmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. In Re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Davis v. . CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Brundage v. . BrundageNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Buck v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In re the Estate of TerwilligarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. In re the Estate of DuniganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  4. In re the Estate of ZaiacNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Construction of the Will of KentNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API