Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1932No. 8545PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRusselu, C. J.

This case is controlled by the principles stated by this court in Dill v. Taylor, 160 Ga. 234 (127 S. E. 737) ; and the writ of error must be dismissed. In the Dill case no response was made to the motion to dismiss, and this failure to respond was construed as an admission of the facts stated in tile motion. In the instant case the plaintiff in error filed a response to the motion, but did not deny the averments of fact in the motion to dismiss.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Smith, Hammond, Smith & Bloodworth, H. H. Anderson, W. B. Robinson, and G. N. King, for plaintiff in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dill v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cox v. Bank of OchlochneeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API