Legal Opinion

Cox v. Bank of Ochlochnee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 6, 1942No. 29451Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION BOR REHEARING.

Stephens, P. J.

The plaintiff in error in a motion for rehearing and a supplement thereto, insists that in affirming the grant of a new trial this court has overlooked certain authoritative utterances which, in the opinion of the movant, would demand a contrary judgment. Movant’s contentions are as follows: (1) that there appears no valid motion for new trial in that there is no brief of the evidence; (2) that the certificate of the judge verifying the recitals in the bill of exceptions, among them being that certain portions of the record are material to an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clements v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Dill v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Kemp v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Brooks v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API