Legal Opinion

United States v. Santos Centeno

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 14, 2015No. 14-2024, 14-2690PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Baldwin and Santos Centeno appeal their convictions and sentences arising from violent assaults at the Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia. 1 Each challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions. In addition, Baldwin argues that his conviction must be reversed due to a constructive amendment of the Indictment and, in any event, that his sentence must be vacated due to the District Court’s failure to personally address him before imposing its sentence. Finally, each contends that one conviction violates the Double Jeopardy…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. McDaniel v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Kareem BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Michael BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. Mitchel Skolnick v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. DelgadoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. DERRY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API