Legal Opinion

United States v. Delgado

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 2019No. CRIMINAL NO. 1:15-CR-3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge *290Defendant Armando Enrique Delgado ("Armando")1 moves for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29. (Doc. 481). He also moves for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. (Doc. 479). Armando claims that the evidence adduced at trial is insufficient to sustain the six counts of conviction. He further maintains that prosecutorial misconduct necessitates a new trial. We will grant in part and deny in part the motion for judgment of acquittal and deny the motion for a new trial.

I. Factual Background…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Armando DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API