Legal Opinion

State v. . Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1937PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

In telling the jury that they should take the exculpatory part of defendant’s confession “with a grain of salt,” the learned judge was evidently under the impression that the defendant had testified in his own behalf. In this he was mistaken. The defendant did not go upon the witness stand. The confession was offered in evidence by the State, and upon the confession the prosecution grounded its case. S. v. Cohoon, 206 N. C., 388, 174 S. E., 91. The defendant was entitled to have the confession considered as given, in its entirety, with whatever views or theories it afforded. S. v. Jones, 79…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Burkhart v. GladishIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. S. v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API