Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Preston

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 2018No. CV–17–553Published

1Opinion of the CourtDavid M. Glover, Judge

Daniel Stovall appeals from the May 19, 2017 order denying his petition to quash Rudy Preston's motion to terminate guardianship. For his sole point of appeal, he contends: "The probate court erred and *639acted contrary to law and public policy when it extended comity in a probate proceeding to a foreign marriage celebrated in Louisiana where the evidence was undisputed that the parties did not actually reside in Louisiana, at the time they celebrated the marriage, and where there was no evidence that the parties consummated the marriage in Louisiana, following the marriage ceremony, as required…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Furth v. FurthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Feehley v. FeehleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Cash v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  4. DePotty v. DePottySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  5. Feigenbaum v. FeigenbaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API