Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Heigman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 26, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The objectant to the account of the administratrix is a registered nurse who claims the sum of $25*000 for nursing services allegedly rendered to the decedent during the period June 25, 1943 to June 25, 1958. The proof was that the decedent and the objectant had occupied the same apartment for more than a score of years preceding the decedent’s death and that the objectant’s sister, in poor health during the entire period, also resided in the apartment. A person who had roomed in the apartment for at least 11 years testified that on some occasions he heard the decedent call…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kearney v. . McKeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Van Slooten v. WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Barney v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Frankenberger v. SchnellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Fox v. . Arctic Placer Mining Milling Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of McLuskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API