Tierney v. Flower
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.
The underlying problem on this appeal is whether the order under review unwarrantedly interferes with the privileged communication existing between the appellant-attorney and his clients.
In September, 1967, the appellant was retained by clients desirous of adopting a child expected soon to be born to the petitioner. Without revealing the identity of these clients, the appellant negotiated with the petitioner, a legal infant, and her father with respect to the expenses of the petitioner’s imminent confinement and the adoption and worked out terms mutually satisfactory to the petitioner and her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People ex rel. Kropp v. ShepskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Doheny v. . LacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People ex rel. Vogelstein v. Warden of the County JailNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- People ex rel. Vogelstein v. WardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Falkenhainer v. FalkenhainerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Jacqueline F.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. Givaudan Flavors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Lemley v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. Fentress, New York County Courts1980
- In re Jacqueline F.New York Surrogate's Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.