Legal Opinion

State v. Button

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 4, 2013No. 12-270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. This case asks us to decide whether a motor-vehicle stop was justified by the community caretaking doctrine. Defendant David Button contends that it was not and argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress the evidentiary fruits of the stop. We reverse.

¶ 2. The trial court found the following facts, which defendant does not dispute. Shortly before midnight on November 19, 2011, defendant was driving west along Perley Road, a gravel country road in a scarcely populated area of Berkshire. At approximately 11:28 p.m., Trooper Jay Riggen was traveling east along the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. MarcelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. State v. JesticeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. State v. TheetgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Terry Lee CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. State v. ButtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. State v. HintonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. State of Iowa v. Terry Lee CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  5. State of Iowa v. Terry Lee CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API