State v. Jestice
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Defendant, who entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of cocaine, argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from an unjustified seizure. We reverse.
¶ 2. At approximately two o’clock in the morning on August 8, 2002, a uniformed Middlebury police officer on routine patrol in a fully marked police cruiser entered a traühead parking lot and observed a young man, defendant, and a young woman sitting in a parked car. The officer pulled his police cruiser nose-to-nose to the car-, leaving his engine running and headlights on. He testified…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Chong in KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. MarcelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- People v. CascioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. Garcia-CantuCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Crain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Houston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.