Stromnes v. Stromnes

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: The court properly denied respondent’s request for a downward modification of unallocated child support, ordered in the judg*982ment of divorce that incorporated but did not merge the parties’ separation agreement. Respondent contended that his cross petition for modification should have been granted because one child was emancipated and another no longer resided with petitioner (see, Urban v Urban, 90 AD2d 793, 794; Peters v Peters, 14 AD2d 778). An unallocated support order…