Peters v. Peters
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The amount of plaintiff’s current income and assets, and the relative income of the respective parties, should be considered in determining the amount of the monthly alimony payments which should now be made by defendant to plaintiff (Phillips v. Phillips, 1 A D 2d 393, affd. 2 N Y 2d 742; Sacknoff v. Sacknoff, 6 A D 2d 879, affd. 7 N Y 2d 771). Defendant may not be compelled to support the daughter, who is married and emancipated; nor may defendant be required to support the son, if he is self-supporting (Sloan v. Sloan, 286 App. Div. 1102; Graffeo v. Graffeo, 7 A D 2d 741). However, the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Henry v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Benson v. BensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Urban v. UrbanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Launder v. PlastiqueNew York City Family Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.