Legal Opinion

Steller v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 2010No. B219935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, Acting P. J.

Counsel attending a mandatory settlement conference in superior court are encouraged to settle all differences between the parties. But, if they want to settle a civil action and a related workers’ compensation action, they must obtain approval of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). As we explain, the difficulty is not insurmountable and we fashion a remedy which is practical and workable, i.e., the settlement is conditional upon WCAB approval.

Wendy Ann Steller appeals from the judgment enforcing a settlement agreement between her and respondent, Sears,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Winograd v. American Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. StowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Claxton v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. ShewryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  2. Camacho v. Target Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Camacho v. Target Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Choy v. Ribeiro CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Gidding v. Salama CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API